LIFE KINDLES THE FLAME OF POETRY
SPEECH
Learned Friends,
I am asked to speak on Creative Experience - in Literature. Creative
experience is a time-worn subject. However I shall endeavour to say a
few words in the light of my experience as a Poet.
Life kindles the flame of poetry, the poet being the 'wick' that burns
to shed warmth and light. Sun can show visible objects like buildings,
trees, rivers, birds, hills, people and so on. Poetry shows on the other
hand, life with its joys and sorrowers, secrets of life, problems of life and
finally its solutions. Wisdom is given in capsules of 'metaphors' Metaphor
is the basic unit of the poem.
Wise men say that it is not right to demystify poetry by submitting it
to critical analysis which is perforce involved in a narration of creative
experience. Nevertheless, no less than intellectuals defied this and
analysed the Act of Creativity, in Art: and specially in poetry, volumes of
criticism evolved from centuries on end. However to my knowledge no
poet on his own explained how he got his symbols, metaphors and his
Purple passages. Either the Poets or Critics said only in general terms in
what state of mind the poet got his lines and what happened to one to
reach that state of mind. In the East and to some extent in the West too,
in the old world, Dialectics of Poetry was an intense activity in Literature
and in the East particularly Indian Sahitya Sastra flowed down the
centuries with uninterrupted continuity, perhaps from times earlier than
the 4th Century B.C, down to about 16th/17th Centuries A.D
Earliest known Rhetorician is Bharata in whose times Play and
Ballad were the only dominant genres - but it is obvious that Bharata was
the last Author on the Dialectics of Play - writing which indicates after a
long duration of time Play- Writing was reduced to a trickle and
eventually vanished. Then followed the endless period of kaavya. While
in the Play action i.e, Abhinaya is the crucial factor, in Kaavya Metaphor
i.e. Alankaara is the crucial factor. With Bhamaha probably in between
the 2nd and 3rd centuries B.C. the Era of Kavya Shastra commenced
ringing the curtain on the Natya and Natya Shastra. After Bharata nobody
wrote a natyashastra. In the modern times in India, Play- Writing draws
on the techniques of the Western Play.
230 ™êÇ≤Ï`«º^OEi≈x
This is only a preface to say that a naration involving critical analysis
of how his symbols and metaphors are acquired by a Poet in the given
cases will demystify the poetry and rob it of this enchantment. That too,
it is bound to happen when the Poet himself indulges in such narration.
Even the Critics do it, their analysis and interpretation are not uniformly
the same but vary from each other whereby the mystery of poetry
survives and the poetic enchantment continues. But when the poet comes
out with the unfolding of his secret his statement becomes the final on the
issue and the statements of the critics differing from that of the poet
become invalid wholesale. Thus the art of Literature ceases to be 'the
moveable feast', and becomes a dead fish by one such grevious mistake
of the Poet.
Nonetheless I would speak in general terms how the Symbols and
Metaphors that a Poet gets are like uninvited guests who spring a pleasant
surprise on the host the Poet. After he comes out of the poem, the poet
himself feels surprised how they came to him. In other words how they
occurred to him. So the Symbols and Metaphors are not deliberately
manipulated and captured like criminals by the police.
Symbols and Metaphors visit only those who have prepared
themselves as the medium to receive those visitors. The poet is of course
only the ordinary individual but with the difference that he cultured
himself by going near and getting involved in life and Literature. By such
a process of involvement one ceases to be the ordinary individual and
becomes too sensitive and therefore suseptible to the invasion of life on
him. He is final limit, and even a whiff of wind can knock out a note of
melody from the vibrant strings. At this point the individual is called Poet
Referring to this condition called 'poet' Bharata says Yortho hridaya
samvaadee yasya bhaavo rasodbhavah Shareeram vyaapyathe thena
shushkam kaashtham ivaagni naa.
(the object with which the poet gets involved and thereby gets totally
involved due to constant engrossment with it, spreads through out his
body from head to foot, like fire spreads through a piece of dry wood).
The French poet Beaudelaire said that the poet reaches this condition by
'perfected sensibility' and the Spanish poet Lorca called it 'sensibility
perfected by reading and experience'.
It is in this condition that the poet's physical EYES become inert so
to say and the THIRD EYE the metaphysical eye opens. The third eye is
âı¿+O„^OE 231
the VISION which sees the invisible things through the visible things;
that is, 'the thing in itself" as kant called it.
Charles Baudelaire lines are for instance useful here to explain what
I said 'the furniture appears to be dreaming and the cloth materials
speak a silent language like flowers', 'the vast park abandons itself to
the eye of the scorching sun like Youth to the domination of love' here
'furniture', 'cloth materials', 'flowers', 'park', 'sun', etc., are seen by the
physical eye but 'furniture dreaming', 'silent speech of flowers', etc., can
only be seen by the metaphysical eye which is called by the Indian
Kaavya Shastra 'darshanam'. 'Naanrishih kavirithyukthah rishishcha
kila darshanaath/ samastha vasthu dharmamscha tatva prakhyaa cha
darshanam'. (kaavya koutukam by Tauta Bhatta). Balzac called it the
'second vision and the greaf Russian Poet Mayakovsky described it as
'the celebrated absent - mindedness of the poet'.
But the most vivid and appealing description of the condition called
'poet' is given by Sharada Tanaya in his Bhava Prakasham as follows.
'parasyasukhaduhkhadeh anubhavena chetasah tadbhava bhavanam
yena bhavet tadanukoolathahtat satwam' he says that Satva Guna which
an individual attains by abhyaasa i.e. practice renders him emotionally
too delicate, too kind and extremely sympathetic, by which he is pained
when his fellow-being is pained, he is happy when his fellow being is
happy. Here fellow-being includes all the living beings of the
creation. This is called 'karuna vedithwa' in Ramayan.
'tathahkarunavedithwaath adharmoya miti dwijah nishaamya
rudateem krauncheem idham vachana mabraveeth' - The more famous
line is 'shokhah shlokathwa maagathah' so out of 'shoka' the poet rises
like the sun. 'shoka' here is equivalent to 'RASA' taadaathmya.
The poet in this condition characteristially reacts with great
vehemence against 'adharma' i.e, 'injustice' and takes the side of
dharma i.e justice, spontaneously. This is how the poet is the real supreme
court of a country.
I think enough is said of the magnificent role of the creative artist.
Thank you.
Central Sahitya Academy
February 22nd, 1995 New Delhi
Seshendra : Visionary Poet of the Millenium
http:// seshendrasharma.weebly.com


